In the Novel, The Hunger Games, Katniss makes an inductive leap too far, when she is told by Rue to cut own the Hornet nest, in order to capture the sleeping enemy by surprise. The logic behind thinking this, is that she could get rid of competition within the arena as well as escape them in order to freely move about to hunt, instead of being cooped up in a tree to starve to death. Though, the inductive leap comes into play when she tries to cut down the nest, without thinking of how dangerous it would be if she got stung. This illogical thinking, caused her to be stung three times. Because of this, one district was killed and Rue and Katniss became close allies. The plot changed, because if Katniss had not been stung, she would not have been weakened or blacked out. If this had not occurred, she surely would have gone after Peeta and killed him because she thought he was allied with the Careers, even though he did this in order to protect Katniss. But, if Rue hadn't pointed out the nest to Katniss, she probably wouldn't have gotten down from the tree without being seriously injured or killed. She either would have been killed by the Careers, starved to death, or been injured bad enough to bleed to death. So, in the end, if this very crucial (though it may seem small) inductive leap, did not occur, Katniss would not have been able to win the Hunger Games along side Peeta. The storyline would have been completely uninteresting, unsuspecting and would not have been such a success with all of its readers.
Collins, Suzanne. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic, 2008. Print.
